|
Gilead Sciences
simeprevir plus remdesivir data ![]() Simeprevir Plus Remdesivir Data, supplied by Gilead Sciences, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 99/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more https://www.bioz.com/product/simeprevir+date/pmc08370243-280-23-25?v=Gilead+Sciences Average 99 stars, based on 1 article reviews
simeprevir plus remdesivir data - by Bioz Stars,
2026-08
99/100 stars
|
Buy from Supplier |
|
Janssen
simeprevir date ![]() Simeprevir Date, supplied by Janssen, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 86/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more https://www.bioz.com/product/simeprevir+date/fda_document____drugsatfda_docs_slash_nda_slash_2013_slash_205123orig1s000clinpharmr-1092-14-1?v=Janssen Average 86 stars, based on 1 article reviews
simeprevir date - by Bioz Stars,
2026-08
86/100 stars
|
Buy from Supplier |
|
Anwendung GmbH
ledipasvir ![]() Ledipasvir, supplied by Anwendung GmbH, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more https://www.bioz.com/product/simeprevir+date/10__1007_slash_s11560___016___0091___0-110-6-17?v=Anwendung+GmbH Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
ledipasvir - by Bioz Stars,
2026-08
90/100 stars
|
Buy from Supplier |
|
Medivir Inc
simeprevir ![]() Simeprevir, supplied by Medivir Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more https://www.bioz.com/product/simeprevir+date/pm24821502-109-6-1?v=Medivir+Inc Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
simeprevir - by Bioz Stars,
2026-08
90/100 stars
|
Buy from Supplier |
Image Search Results
Journal: Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
Article Title: Hepatitis C Virus Protease Inhibitors Show Differential Efficacy and Interactions with Remdesivir for Treatment of SARS-CoV-2 In Vitro
doi: 10.1128/AAC.02680-20
Figure Lengend Snippet: Potency of a panel of HCV PIs and an HCV NS4A inhibitor against SARS-CoV-2 in Vero E6 cells. Vero E6 cells were seeded in 96-well plates and, the following day, infected with SARS-CoV-2 at an MOI of 0.002 followed by treatment with specified concentrations of the PIs boceprevir, telaprevir, narlaprevir, simeprevir, paritaprevir, grazoprevir, glecaprevir, voxilaprevir, vaniprevir, danoprevir, deldeprevir, asunaprevir, and faldaprevir as well as HCV NS4A inhibitor ACH-806, as described in Materials and Methods. After 46 to 50 h of incubation, SARS-CoV-2-infected cells were visualized by immunostaining for the SARS-CoV-2 spike protein and quantified by automated counting, as described in Materials and Methods. Data points (red dots) are means of counts from 7 replicate cultures ± standard errors of the means (SEMs) and represent percent residual infectivity, determined as percent SARS-CoV-2-positive cells relative to means of counts from 14 replicate infected nontreated control cultures. Sigmoidal concentration-response curves (red lines) were fitted and EC 50 values were determined, as described in Materials and Methods. Cell viability data were obtained in replicate assays with noninfected cells using a colorimetric assay, as described in Materials and Methods. Data points (blue triangles) are means from 3 replicate cultures ± SEMs and represent percent cell viability relative to mean absorbance from 12 replicate nontreated control cultures. Sigmoidal concentration-response curves were fitted and CC 50 values were determined as shown in Fig. S4 in the supplemental material. The red dotted lines represent the drug concentrations at which DMSO is expected to induce antiviral effects with reduction of residual infectivity to <70%, according to Fig. S2. The blue dotted lines represent the drug concentrations at which DMSO is expected to induce cytotoxicity with reduction of cell viability to <90%, according to Fig. S2.
Article Snippet: For combination treatments, the same PI and remdesivir concentrations as used in single treatments were applied with a fixed ratio, except for the
Techniques: Infection, Incubation, Immunostaining, Concentration Assay, Colorimetric Assay
Journal: Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
Article Title: Hepatitis C Virus Protease Inhibitors Show Differential Efficacy and Interactions with Remdesivir for Treatment of SARS-CoV-2 In Vitro
doi: 10.1128/AAC.02680-20
Figure Lengend Snippet: Potency of a panel of HCV PIs and an HCV NS4A inhibitor against SARS-CoV-2 in vitro
Article Snippet: For combination treatments, the same PI and remdesivir concentrations as used in single treatments were applied with a fixed ratio, except for the
Techniques:
Journal: Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
Article Title: Hepatitis C Virus Protease Inhibitors Show Differential Efficacy and Interactions with Remdesivir for Treatment of SARS-CoV-2 In Vitro
doi: 10.1128/AAC.02680-20
Figure Lengend Snippet: Potency of selected HCV PIs against SARS-CoV-2 was confirmed in Huh7.5 cells. Huh7.5 cells were seeded in 96-well plates and, the following day, infected with SARS-CoV-2 at an MOI of 0.02 followed by treatment with specified concentrations of the PIs boceprevir, simeprevir, and grazoprevir, as described in Materials and Methods. After 70 to 74 h of incubation, SARS-CoV-2-infected cells were visualized by immunostaining for the SARS-CoV-2 spike protein and quantified by automated counting, as described in Materials and Methods. Data points (red dots) are means from 7 replicates ± SEMs and represent percent residual infectivity, determined as percent SARS-CoV-2-positive cells relative to means of counts from 14 replicate infected nontreated control cultures. Sigmoidal concentration-response curves (red lines) were fitted and EC 50 values were determined, as described in Materials and Methods. Cell viability data were obtained in replicate assays with noninfected cells using a colorimetric assay as described in Materials and Methods. Data points (blue triangles) are means from 3 replicate cultures ± SEMs and represent percent cell viability relative to mean absorbance from 12 nontreated controls. Sigmoidal concentration-response curves were fitted and CC 50 values were determined, as shown in Fig. S5. The blue dotted line represents the drug concentrations at which DMSO is expected to induce cytotoxicity with reduction of cell viability to <90%, according to Fig. S2; DMSO did not induce antiviral effects in the tested concentration ranges (Fig. S2).
Article Snippet: For combination treatments, the same PI and remdesivir concentrations as used in single treatments were applied with a fixed ratio, except for the
Techniques: Infection, Incubation, Immunostaining, Concentration Assay, Colorimetric Assay
Journal: Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
Article Title: Hepatitis C Virus Protease Inhibitors Show Differential Efficacy and Interactions with Remdesivir for Treatment of SARS-CoV-2 In Vitro
doi: 10.1128/AAC.02680-20
Figure Lengend Snippet: Potency of selected HCV PIs against SARS-CoV-2 was confirmed in A549-hACE2 cells. A549-hACE2 cells were seeded in 96-well plates and, the following day, infected with SARS-CoV-2 at an MOI of 0.003 followed by treatment with specified concentrations of the PIs boceprevir, simeprevir, grazoprevir, glecaprevir, and voxilaprevir, as described in Materials and Methods. After 46 to 50 h of incubation, SARS-CoV-2-infected cells were visualized by immunostaining for the SARS-CoV-2 spike protein and quantified by automated counting, as described in Materials and Methods. Data points (red dots) are means from 7 replicates ± SEMs and represent percent residual infectivity, determined as percent SARS-CoV-2-positive cells relative to means of counts from 14 replicate infected nontreated control cultures. Sigmoidal concentration-response curves (red lines) were fitted and EC 50 values were determined, as described in Materials and Methods. Cell viability data were obtained in replicate assays with noninfected cells using a colorimetric assay as described in Materials and Methods. Data points (blue triangles) are means from 3 replicate cultures ± SEMs and represent percent cell viability relative to mean absorbance from 12 nontreated controls. Sigmoidal concentration-response curves were fitted and CC 50 values were determined, as shown in Fig. S6. The red dotted lines represent the drug concentrations at which DMSO is expected to induce antiviral effects with reduction of residual infectivity to <70%, according to Fig. S2. The blue dotted lines represent the drug concentrations at which DMSO is expected to induce cytotoxicity with reduction of cell viability to <90%, according to Fig. S2.
Article Snippet: For combination treatments, the same PI and remdesivir concentrations as used in single treatments were applied with a fixed ratio, except for the
Techniques: Infection, Incubation, Immunostaining, Concentration Assay, Colorimetric Assay
Journal: Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
Article Title: Hepatitis C Virus Protease Inhibitors Show Differential Efficacy and Interactions with Remdesivir for Treatment of SARS-CoV-2 In Vitro
doi: 10.1128/AAC.02680-20
Figure Lengend Snippet: Analysis of interactions of selected HCV PIs with remdesivir in Vero E6 cells. Vero E6 cells seeded in 96-well plates were infected the following day with SARS-CoV-2 at an MOI of 0.002 followed by treatment with serial dilutions of the linear PI boceprevir (BOC) or narlaprevir (NAR), the macrocyclic PI simeprevir (SIM), paritaprevir (PAR), or grazoprevir (GRA), polymerase inhibitor remdesivir (REM), or a combination of these PIs and remdesivir, as described in Materials and Methods. After 46 to 50 h of incubation, SARS-CoV-2-infected cells were visualized by immunostaining for the SARS-CoV-2 spike protein and quantified by automated counting, as described in Materials and Methods. For each inhibitor pair to be evaluated, 7 to 10 treatment conditions were used (indicated on x axes). Each treatment condition was defined by a given concentration of PI applied singly, a given concentration of remdesivir applied singly, and a combination of these same concentrations of PIs and remdesivir, as specified in Table S2, resulting in 3 data points per treatment condition. Data points are means from 6 or 7 replicates ± SEMs and represent percent residual infectivity, determined as percent SARS-CoV-2-positive cells relative to means of counts from infected nontreated control cultures. Sigmoidal concentration-response curves were fitted as described in Materials and Methods. The tested inhibitor concentrations did not impact cell viability (Fig. S8). DMSO did not induce antiviral effects in the tested concentration ranges (Fig. S2).
Article Snippet: For combination treatments, the same PI and remdesivir concentrations as used in single treatments were applied with a fixed ratio, except for the
Techniques: Infection, Incubation, Immunostaining, Concentration Assay
Journal: Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
Article Title: Hepatitis C Virus Protease Inhibitors Show Differential Efficacy and Interactions with Remdesivir for Treatment of SARS-CoV-2 In Vitro
doi: 10.1128/AAC.02680-20
Figure Lengend Snippet: Analysis of interactions of selected HCV PIs with remdesivir in A549-hACE2 cells. A549-hACE2 cells seeded in 96-well plates were infected the following day with SARS-CoV-2 at an MOI of 0.003 followed by treatment with serial dilutions of the linear PI boceprevir (BOC), the macrocyclic PI simeprevir (SIM) or grazoprevir (GRA), polymerase inhibitor remdesivir (REM), or a combination of these PIs and remdesivir, as described in Materials and Methods. After 46 to 50 h of incubation, SARS-CoV-2-infected cells were visualized by immunostaining for the SARS-CoV-2 spike protein and quantified by automated counting, as described in Materials and Methods. For each inhibitor pair to be evaluated, 8 to 10 treatment conditions were used (indicated on x axes). Each treatment condition was defined by a given concentration of PI applied singly, a given concentration of remdesivir applied singly, and a combination of these same concentrations of PIs and remdesivir, as specified in Table S2, resulting in 3 data points per treatment condition. Data points are means from 7 replicates ± SEMs and represent percent residual infectivity, determined as percent SARS-CoV-2-positive cells relative to means of counts from infected nontreated control cultures. Sigmoidal concentration-response curves were fitted as described in Materials and Methods. DMSO was kept constant in all cultures. The tested inhibitor concentrations did not impair cell viability (Fig. S8). DMSO did not induce antiviral effects in the tested concentration ranges (Fig. S2).
Article Snippet: For combination treatments, the same PI and remdesivir concentrations as used in single treatments were applied with a fixed ratio, except for the
Techniques: Infection, Incubation, Immunostaining, Concentration Assay
Journal: Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
Article Title: Hepatitis C Virus Protease Inhibitors Show Differential Efficacy and Interactions with Remdesivir for Treatment of SARS-CoV-2 In Vitro
doi: 10.1128/AAC.02680-20
Figure Lengend Snippet: Comparison of barriers to escape for HCV PIs at equipotent concentrations in Vero E6 cells. Vero E6 cells seeded the previous day in T25 flasks were infected with SARS-CoV-2 at an MOI of 0.00002 followed by treatment with 1-fold EC 50 of boceprevir, telaprevir, narlaprevir, simeprevir, paritaprevir, grazoprevir, vaniprevir, danoprevir, asunaprevir, and faldaprevir, which were administered immediately after infection and subsequently at the indicated time points postinfection when cells were split, as described in Materials and Methods. (Left) Percentages of SARS-CoV-2-infected cells on the specified days postinfection were determined by anti-spike protein immunostaining of replicate cultures derived following cell splitting and treatment. (Middle) SARS-CoV-2 RNA titers determined in cell culture supernatants as genome copies per milliliter on the specified days postinfection were determined by RT-qPCR assays. The black line indicates the lower limit of quantification (LLOQ). In the left and middle panels, to facilitate comparisons, bars are color coded according to the day postinfection, and blue and red dotted lines were inserted to highlight day 1 and 3 values of the nontreated culture, respectively. (Right) Replicate cultures were derived following cell splitting and treatment, immunostained for the SARS-CoV-2 spike protein (green) and counterstained with Hoechst dye (blue), and images were acquired, as described in Materials and Methods. Cultures summarized in this figure are derived from different experimental setups, each including an infected nontreated control culture, which showed viral spread comparable to that in the depicted representative culture. *, culture was terminated, or infection data not recorded, due to virus-induced cell death; **, culture was terminated due to drug-induced cytotoxicity, possibly enhanced by viral infection.
Article Snippet: For combination treatments, the same PI and remdesivir concentrations as used in single treatments were applied with a fixed ratio, except for the
Techniques: Infection, Immunostaining, Derivative Assay, Cell Culture, Quantitative RT-PCR
Journal: Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
Article Title: Hepatitis C Virus Protease Inhibitors Show Differential Efficacy and Interactions with Remdesivir for Treatment of SARS-CoV-2 In Vitro
doi: 10.1128/AAC.02680-20
Figure Lengend Snippet: Comparison of barriers to escape for HCV PIs in A549-hACE2 cells. A549-hACE2 cells seeded the previous day in T25 flasks were infected with SARS-CoV-2 at an MOI of 0.0005, followed by treatment with indicated concentrations of specified inhibitors administered immediately after infection and subsequently at the listed time points when cells were split, as described in Materials and Methods. BOC, boceprevir; SIM, simeprevir; GRA, grazoprevir; REM, remdesivir. Upon splitting of cells, cell culture supernatant was harvested and subjected to RT-qPCR for determination of SARS-CoV-2 RNA titers determined as genome copies per milliliter. The black lines indicate the LLOQs. To facilitate comparisons, bars are color coded according to the day postinfection, and blue and red dotted lines were inserted to highlight day 1 and 3 values of the nontreated culture, respectively. Cultures summarized in this figure are derived from different experimental setups, each including an infected nontreated control culture, which showed viral spread comparable to that in the depicted representative culture. (Left) Treatment with 1-fold EC 50 boceprevir, simeprevir, or grazoprevir. (Middle) Treatment with 1-, 2-, 3-, 4-, 5-, and 8-fold EC 50 boceprevir. *, culture was terminated due to virus- or drug-induced cytotoxicity; # , culture was maintained for a total of 13 days without indication of infection (RNA titers were around the LLOQ and no observation of single SARS-CoV-2 spike protein-positive cells). (Right) Treatment with 0.8-fold EC 50 remdesivir, 1-fold EC 50 boceprevir, 1-fold EC 50 simeprevir, or 1-fold EC 50 grazoprevir singly or with a combination of remdesivir with either of the PIs.
Article Snippet: For combination treatments, the same PI and remdesivir concentrations as used in single treatments were applied with a fixed ratio, except for the
Techniques: Infection, Cell Culture, Quantitative RT-PCR, Derivative Assay
Journal: Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
Article Title: Hepatitis C Virus Protease Inhibitors Show Differential Efficacy and Interactions with Remdesivir for Treatment of SARS-CoV-2 In Vitro
doi: 10.1128/AAC.02680-20
Figure Lengend Snippet: At equipotent concentrations, simeprevir and grazoprevir but not boceprevir synergized with remdesivir to completely suppress viral infection in Vero E6 cells. Vero E6 cells seeded the previous day in T25 flasks were infected with SARS-CoV-2 at an MOI of 0.00002 followed by treatment with 0.4-fold EC 50 remdesivir (REM), 1-fold EC 50 boceprevir (BOC), 1-fold EC 50 simeprevir (SIM), or 1-fold EC 50 grazoprevir (GRA) singly or with a combination of remdesivir with either of the PIs, which were administered immediately after infection and subsequently at the indicated time points when cells were split, as described in Materials and Methods. (Left) Percentages of SARS-CoV-2-infected cells on the specified days postinfection were determined by anti-spike protein immunostaining of replicate cultures derived following cell splitting and treatment. (Middle) SARS-CoV-2 RNA titers determined in cell culture supernatants as genome copies per milliliter on the specified days postinfection were determined by RT-qPCR assays. The black lines indicate the LLOQs. In the left and middle panels, to facilitate comparisons, bars are color coded according to the day postinfection, and blue and red dotted lines were inserted to highlight day 1 and 3 values of the nontreated culture, respectively. (Right) Replicate cultures were derived following cell splitting and treatment, immunostained for the SARS-CoV-2 spike protein (green) and counterstained with Hoechst dye (blue), and images were acquired, as described in Materials and Methods. Cultures summarized in this figure are derived from two different experimental setups (REM/BOC/SIM and REM/GRA experiments), each including the respective depicted nontreated control culture. *, culture was terminated, or infection data not recorded, due to virus-induced cell death; # , culture was maintained for a total of 15 days without indication of infection (no observation of single SARS-CoV-2 spike protein-positive cells and RNA titers were around the LLOQ).
Article Snippet: For combination treatments, the same PI and remdesivir concentrations as used in single treatments were applied with a fixed ratio, except for the
Techniques: Infection, Immunostaining, Derivative Assay, Cell Culture, Quantitative RT-PCR